Blog - 04/07/2017
Landlord & Tenant (Covenants) Act – Timely proposals for reform
The Property Litigation Association (PLA) has recently issued some proposed amendments to the Landlord and Tenant (Covenants) Act 1995 (LTCA 95) to address commercial issues that have arisen as a consequence of how provisions of the LTCA 1995 have been interpreted in various recent cases. The PLA has approached the Law Commission with the support of the British Property Federation, the British Retail Consortium, and the Property Bar Association to discuss amendments to the LTCA 1995 to address these commercial issues, including:
- an inability for a Tenant to lawfully assign to its own Guarantor;
- an inability for Tenant to assign intra-group whilst having the same guarantor;
- how to unwind any assignment and the issues arising upon any unwinding;
- an assignor (in the recent EMI case –EMI Group Ltd v O & H Q1 Ltd  EWHC 529 (Ch)) being bound by a tenant covenant following a purported assignment contrary to the purpose of the LTCA 95 to release a Tenant from continuing to be bound by the tenant covenants, post assignment.
The PLA has drafted some minor proposed amendments to the LTCA 95 including a proposed new s24 (2A) and s24 (2B), together with consequential amendments.
The key principles of the PLA proposals include amendments designed to:
- Clarify that that an assignor’s guarantor can provide a sub-guarantee of the assignor’s authorised guarantee agreement (AGA). This is likely to be OK currently, though as the judicial comment on it is obiter, clarity in the LTCA 95 would be welcome.
- Allow an assignor’s guarantor to provide a repeat guarantee to a group company assignee.
- Permit an assignor’s guarantor to be the assignee of the tenancy – to get round the problems caused by the recent EMI case.
- Provide certainty in partnership situations to ensure that A, B, C and D can assign to B, C, D and E.
The PLA has indicated that it stands ready to lend any assistance to the Law Commission to ensure the early reform of the LTCA 95 in the best interests of legal clarity and more importantly is in the best interests of the property industry as a whole. Such reform is to be encouraged and will be welcomed by the wider commercial property industry.
For further information regarding this topic or any other property and construction matter, please contact Consultant, Robert McNally, or any member of Edwin Coe Property or Construction team.
If you aren’t receiving our legal updates directly to your mailbox, please sign up now
Please note that this blog is provided for general information only. It is not intended to amount to advice on which you should rely. You must obtain professional or specialist advice before taking, or refraining from, any action on the basis of the content of this blog.
Edwin Coe LLP is a Limited Liability Partnership, registered in England & Wales (No.OC326366). The Firm is authorised and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority. A list of members of the LLP is available for inspection at our registered office address: 2 Stone Buildings, Lincoln’s Inn, London, WC2A 3TH. “Partner” denotes a member of the LLP or an employee or consultant with the equivalent standing.