Misfeasance
Allegations of misfeasance can also include suggestions that a director failed to act in the best interests of the company, for example, conflict of interest situations, having competing interests or diverting contracts or other business away from the company.
Specifically, section 212 of the Insolvency Act 1986 provides that if a director of a company that has gone into liquidation has misapplied or retained any of the company’s money or property; or been guilty of any misfeasance or breach of any fiduciary or other duty in relation to the company, the court may compel that director to account for the relevant money or property, or to contribute such amount to the company’s assets as the court thinks just as compensation for the misfeasance or breach. The court may make such an order on the application of a creditor as well as the liquidator.
This provision does not create a new cause of action but essentially provides a summary procedure for breach of duty and/or misfeasance claims to be pursued. A creditor or insolvency office-holder can make use of this procedure, but a creditor has no direct claim for loss suffered against a director; rather a creditor would have to base a claim on loss suffered by the company (and its creditors generally, by extension).
We are a team of recognised and specialist restructuring and insolvency lawyers with decades of experience in this field. We are approachable, constructive and focussed. Call us today to discuss any issue that you might have on this topic.