The Court’s Discretion
The court has a wide discretion whether or not to rescind a winding-up order and the burden is on the applicant to satisfy the court that it is an appropriate case in which to exercise that discretion. There is no limit to the factors that the court can take into account when considering to rescind a winding-up order.
Generally, the court will need to be satisfied that the petition debt and liquidation costs can be paid in full and that the company is at least cash-flow solvent. This may require additional evidence, such as a cash-flow forecast, to be included in with the supporting witness statement.
The court will also need to be satisfied that the application has not been presented in a misleading way and that it is in possession of all material facts and that the trading operations of the company have been fair, transparent and do not require investigation.
Where rescission is necessary to correct an injustice
The jurisdiction to rescind a winding-up order is available to correct an injustice. This could include, for example, where there is evidence that the company was not aware of the winding-up petition and thus unable to respond it to prior to a winding-up order being made.
Change of circumstances since the winding-up order was made
It is fundamental to any application for a rescission order, that there is some change of circumstances presented to the court, from those circumstances presented to the Court when the winding-up order was made. This should be presented clearly in the supporting witness statement. Some examples include:
- The company did not attend the winding-up petition hearing.
- Substantial new evidence. For example, evidence of the company’s ability to fund its operations that was not previously made available to the court.
- Mistaken identity. For example, where a winding-up order was made against the wrong company because it has a similar name.