VAT on Luxury Assets: Lessons to be learned from the Roman Abramovich exposé

When it comes to luxury assets—yachts, private jets, high-end cars, fine art—the ultra-wealthy don’t just buy them; they structure them. Whether it’s a footballer’s private jet, a tech billionaire’s superyacht, or an art collector’s latest acquisition, the way these assets are owned, operated, and taxed can be just as complex as the asset itself. Done right, this structuring is smart tax planning. Done wrong, it’s a legal and reputational minefield.

The recent exposé on Roman Abramovich’s VAT arrangements, where he allegedly avoided millions in tax through a web of fake yacht hire agreements, perfectly illustrates the difference between shrewd tax planning and aggressive tax avoidance.

So where’s the line? And how do luxury asset owners stay on the right side of it?

VAT on Luxury Assets: The Basics

Value Added Tax (VAT) is a consumption tax applied to goods and services. For everyday consumers, it’s straightforward; buy something, pay VAT. But for the ultra-wealthy, where purchases involve yachts, jets, and multimillion-pound paintings, the rules become more intricate.

Luxury assets can attract VAT at rates ranging from 5% to 25%, depending on the jurisdiction and the asset’s use. There are legal ways to mitigate these costs:

• Commercial use exemptions: Assets used for legitimate business purposes can often reclaim VAT.
• Leasing structures: Setting up leasing arrangements can spread VAT costs over time.
• Temporary import relief: Non-residents bringing luxury assets into a country for short periods may avoid VAT under certain conditions.

These are all perfectly legal tax planning tools, when used correctly. But misuse them, and it quickly turns into avoidance.

The Abramovich Playbook: A Lesson in Overreach

Abramovich, according to investigative reports, took tax planning too far. His yachts, some of the most expensive in the world, were supposedly available for charter, allowing his management company to reclaim VAT on operational costs. The problem? Apparently these yachts weren’t genuinely being rented out. Instead, they were leased between Abramovich’s own companies, creating the illusion of commercial use while he retained full control.

This supposed artificial structuring was flagged by tax authorities in Italy and Cyprus, with Cyprus alone seeking €14 million in unpaid VAT. It is important to note that if the yachts genuinely had been operating as commercial charter vessels, the VAT reclaim would be legitimate.

Common VAT Mistakes with Luxury Assets

While most individuals won’t be dealing with billion-dollar superyachts, the principles of VAT compliance apply across all luxury assets. Here are some of the most common pitfalls:

1. Misclassifying Personal Assets as Commercial

• VAT exemptions and deductions exist for business use, but personal enjoyment doesn’t count.
• Claiming a yacht, jet, or car is a “business asset” while using it exclusively for personal trips can lead to penalties.

2. Artificial Leasing Arrangements

• Leasing a jet or yacht to yourself (via another company you own) might look like a commercial transaction, but tax authorities can easily see through this.
• If the leasing structure lacks genuine third-party transactions, expect scrutiny.

3. Import VAT Evasion

• Bringing a private jet or yacht into a jurisdiction without paying import VAT is a classic mistake.
• Tax authorities monitor luxury assets crossing borders, and failing to pay VAT on imports can lead to significant penalties.

4. Misuse of VAT Refunds

• Some jurisdictions allow VAT refunds for goods exported out of the country.
• Falsely claiming an export VAT refund while keeping the asset in the country can trigger serious legal consequences.

How to Stay on the Right Side of the Law

1. Document Everything: VAT deductions and exemptions rely on proper documentation. Maintain clear records of transactions, leases, and commercial use.
2. Seek Expert Advice: VAT laws differ between jurisdictions. Luxury asset owners should work with tax specialists to ensure compliance.
3. Don’t Push the Boundaries Too Far: If a tax arrangement seems too good to be true, it probably is. Tax authorities increasingly use data analytics and cross-border cooperation to detect aggressive avoidance.

Final Thoughts

Roman Abramovich’s case serves as a high-profile warning: tax authorities are more sophisticated than ever, and luxury assets are firmly on their radar. The key to smart tax planning isn’t finding loopholes, it’s understanding the rules and using them correctly.

For those with high-value assets, VAT planning is essential. But the difference between legitimate tax efficiency and costly tax avoidance often comes down to one thing: substance. If a structure exists only for tax purposes, it’s unlikely to hold up under scrutiny. And as we’ve seen, the consequences can be severe.

Our Tax Risk & Dispute Resolution practice has substantial knowledge and experience in this specialist area of tax. For further information, please contact Morag Ofili or any of our partners in the Tax team.

If you aren’t receiving our tax updates directly to your mailbox, please sign up now