For some time now developers – and the professionals advising them – have found increasing difficulty in dealing with rights of light.  An owner of a building adjoining a potential development site can acquire rights of light over it; merely by doing nothing; and those rights will be protected by the courts, to the extent of an injunction requiring work to stop or a building to be demolished or altered.  As a result, an adjoining owner can extract a substantial amount of value from the scheme simply by being there.

As the Association of Light Practitioners observed in their evidence to the Law Commission:

“A developer can act entirely properly and proactively, looking to negotiate a resolution, whilst it is actually in the interest of a neighbour to sit back and not engage, to increase the sum they can demand”.

Following some years of lobbying, the Law Commission has taken the matter in hand and their report, published last week, provides some encouragement.  Broadly, their proposals are fourfold:-

  1. In future, it should no longer be possible to acquire rights to light by prescription (long enjoyment).
  2. A new statutory test should be introduced to clarify when damages may be awarded instead of an injunction.
  3. A new statutory notice procedure should be introduced, requiring those with the benefit of rights of light to state whether or not they intend to apply to the court for an injunction, so that a developer knows where he stands.
  4. The Lands Chamber of the Upper Tribunal (the old Lands Tribunal) should be able to extinguish rights to light that are obsolete or have no practical benefit, with payment of compensation where appropriate – as it can do with restrictive covenants.

As ever, there is a consultation procedure, which runs till May.  I would urge you all, as ever, to read the paper – link below – or at least the executive summary, and make your representations.  Of course, proposals are one thing, actual legislation is another but it would be nice to think that something might happen, sometime soon.

One final thought: I am looking out of my window on a greyish February morning.  The light in my office is on.  It is on every working day, winter and summer, not just in this office, but, so far as I can recall, in every office that I have visited.  Given the protections offered by the laws on planning and building control, why, in this century, do we need rights of light at all?  Answers on a postcard, please, to the Law Commission.

If you would like any further information about this issue, please contact me at philip.boursnell@edwincoe.com

Please note that this blog is provided for general information only. It is not intended to amount to advice on which you should rely. You must obtain professional or specialist advice before taking, or refraining from, any action on the basis of the content of this blog.

Edwin Coe LLP is a limited liability partnership registered in England and Wales (No. OC326366) and is authorised and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority. A list of members of the LLP is available for inspection at our registered office: 2 Stone Buildings, Lincoln's Inn, London WC2A 3TH. "Partner" denotes a member of the LLP or an employee or consultant with the equivalent standing. Our privacy notice which we are obliged to give you under the GDPR is available here.

Please also see a copy of our terms of use here in respect of our website which apply also to all of our blogs.

Latest Blogs See All

Share by: