A recent case has again highlighted the consequences of the “registration gap”, which is the time between a tenant acquiring a lease and that acquisition being registered at the Land Registry. Until the registration has taken place, the tenant only has an equitable interest in the lease, and this has a number of implications for both landlords and tenants.

One such implication was shown in a recent case, Sackville v Robertson. In this case, Integro, the assignee, had acquired the lease by assignment from Robertson, the assignor. After acquiring the lease, Integro wanted to serve a break notice, as permitted by the lease, to bring the lease to an end. However, Integro was only an “equitable assignee” when the break notice was served on the landlord, and the court held that the break notice was invalid. Integro was deemed to be an equitable assignee due to the fact that the assignment of the lease to it had not been registered at the Land Registry.

This case demonstrates the importance of taking legal advice when serving break notices, particularly on or around the date of an assignment.

If you require further assistance, please contact the Edwin Coe Property team.

Please note that this blog is provided for general information only. It is not intended to amount to advice on which you should rely. You must obtain professional or specialist advice before taking, or refraining from, any action on the basis of the content of this blog.

Edwin Coe LLP is a Limited Liability Partnership, registered in England & Wales (No.OC326366). The Firm is authorised and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority. A list of members of the LLP is available for inspection at our registered office address: 2 Stone Buildings, Lincoln’s Inn, London, WC2A 3TH. “Partner” denotes a member of the LLP or an employee or consultant with the equivalent standing.

Please also see a copy of our terms of use here in respect of our website which apply also to all of our blogs.

Latest Blogs See All

Share by: